Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Retrolaminar Block versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in lumbar spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202510583977933

Enrollment

Registered

2025-10-08

Start date

2024-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery Orthopaedics Anaesthesia

Interventions

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Retrolaminar Block

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Both sex. 2. Age from 18 to 65 years old 3. ASA of class I and II 4. Planned for elective lumbar spine under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient refusal. 2. a history of opioid dependence, 3. experiencing any bleeding disorder 4. Uncontrolled Psychiatric diseases. 5. Known intolerance to the study drugs. 6. Unstable cardiovascular condition. 7. Severe audiovisual impairment preventing participation in cognitive function testing.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The total cumulative fentanyl consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time to rescue analgesia.;Pain score at rest ;The number of patients requiring rescue analgesia.;Any adverse events, including hypotension, bradycardia, dry mouth, dizziness, diplopia, and nausea and vomiting;Patients’ satisfaction: with the anesthesia technique will be assessed at 24 hours after surgery using an 11-point satisfaction score (0= completely unsatisfied, 10= most satisfied)	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactShimaa Abdelsatar Shalaby

Shimaa A. Shalaby

shimaashalaby1@gmail.com+201098252796

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026