Assessing the Effects of Staircase Recruitment VS Low Fixed PEEP by lung ultrasound In Laparoscopic Surgeries Among Hepatic Patients

Assessing the Effects of Staircase Recruitment VS Low Fixed PEEP by lung ultrasound In Laparoscopic Surgeries Among Hepatic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202510497215100

Enrollment

Registered

2025-10-13

Start date

2025-10-11

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaesthesia

Interventions

fixed PEEP

Stepwise lung recruitment maneuver

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA II. 2. CHILD A and B 3. Male and female patients aged 30-50 years old. 4. Serum Albumin level more than 3.5 g/dl.?

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known history of chest disease 2. Preoperative chemotherapy, cachexia. 3. Previous thoracic procedures. 4. Current upper respiratory infection (URI), COPD. 5. History of general anesthesia within 2 weeks; preoperative hypoxemia. 6. Body mass index (BMI) more than 30 kg/m2. 7. Hemodynamic instability or non-cooperation. 8. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
-Using lung US score as a primary outcome, The severity of aeration loss was evaluated by ARISCAT (Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia) score	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Measurement of PF ratio. 2. Measurement of plateau pressure. 3. Measurement of hemodynamics. 4. ICU stay. 5. Post-operative pulmonary complications.	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public Contacthanaa rashed

anasthesia lecturer

hanaarashed2020@yahoo.com01001378542

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026