The Efficacy of Different Methods to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Shocked Patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202508541931961

Enrollment

Registered

2025-08-29

Start date

2022-12-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Circulatory System Cardiology

Interventions

Electrical Cardiometry

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1- Adult patients above 18 years old. 2- Involved cases with early (less than a day duration) shock who were admitted to a critical care.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1- Left ventricular ejection fraction below fifty percent. 2- Right ventricular failure. 3- Pulmonary hypertension. 4- Valvular heart disease. 5- Cardiac dysrhythmia. 6- The presence of carotid artery stenosis above fifty percent by carotid ultrasound. 7- Raised intracranial pressure. 8- Recent abdominal surgery. 9- History of thromboembolism. 10- Cases who were unable to endure PLR maneuver.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The purpose of the current investigation is to evaluate carotid corrected flow-time (cFT) and electrical cardiometry in predicting fluid responsiveness in shocked mechanically ventilated patients in first 24 hours.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There is purpose also to evaluate the critical care stay of patients either responsive or non-resposive according to the change of carotid flow time before and after passive leg raising.	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactBasma Nasr

M.B. B.Ch

mfhk1234567@gmail.com01003684092

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026