Skip to content

A Study Comparing Two Types of Breast Lump Biopsy Methods in Women Receiving Care in Resource-Limited Hospitals

WIDE-NAB: A Randomized Feasibility Study Comparing Wide-Bore Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy Techniques in the Diagnosis of Breast Masses in Low-Resource Settings

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202507578823215
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-07-15
Start date
2025-02-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Interventions

Wide Bore Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Histology

Sponsors

Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncologists of Nigeria
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women aged =18 years Presence of a suspicious, solid breast mass (BI-RADS 4 or 5) confirmed by ultrasound, measuring =2 cm in maximum diameter. This threshold minimizes the risk of sampling failure or histologic inadequacy, given the paired-sample design requiring two biopsies per lesion. Ability to provide informed consent Willingness to complete follow-up procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Coagulopathy, bleeding disorder Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets (except low-dose aspirin) Active breast infection or skin ulceration Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent or complete follow-up procedures Lesions <2 cm in size.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Procedure completion rate- Proportion of biopsy procedures successfully completed as per protocol ;Retention rate- Proportion of enrolled participants who complete both Wide-NAB and CNB procedures and follow-up assessments. ;Sample adequacy- Proportion of biopsy samples yielding sufficient tissue for definitive histopathological diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Procedure duration – Total time (in minutes) from needle insertion to completion of sample retrieval. ;Sample yield (radiologist-graded) – Visual adequacy based on apparent core size (=0.2 cm), color consistency with soft tissue, and whether the core sinks in formalin. ;Device malfunction rate – Frequency of mechanical failure or functional inadequacy of the biopsy device during use. ;Tissue adequacy (pathologist-graded): Assessed by the sufficiency of lesional tissue present, using the predefined 4-point grading scale detailed in the pathology evaluation section. ;Diagnostic concordance – Agreement between histopathological results of Wide-NAB and CNB, assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. ;Exploratory diagnostic accuracy- Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) among participants who undergo surgical excision biopsy, used as the reference standard. ;Patient-reported pain – Assessed post-procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). ;Patient-reported satisfaction – Assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

Countries

Nigeria

Contacts

Public ContactAkinola Odedeyi

Consultant Radiologist Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex

akinolaodedeyi@gmail.com+2348066124415

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026