Skip to content

A Comparison of postoperative pain in endodontic treatment following the use of conventional and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques: A randomized clinical Trial

A Comparison of postoperative pain in endodontic treatment following the use of conventional and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques: A randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202505705549179
Enrollment
112
Registered
2025-05-15
Start date
2023-05-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health

Interventions

PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION GROUP

Sponsors

DR NABOYA AISHA NANA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria 1. Symptomatic and asymptomatic teeth due to irreversible pulpitis, pulpal necrosis and apical periodontitis. 2. Healthy patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who require root canal therapy as an elective procedure. 3. Single and/or multirooted teeth except for third molars with none or minimal (0-2 mm) periapical radiolucency. 4. Teeth with closed apices that require root canal therapy. 5. Teeth with no periapical cyst. 6. Presence of favorable root morphology in anterior, premolar and molar teeth that require root canal therapy. 7. Patients not on analgesics or sedative medications before root canal therapy for about 24-48 hours before treatment. 8. Patients who meet all the above criteria and give consent to be part of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria 1. Teeth with calcified canals, root resorption, immature and/or open apex. 2. Teeth with sinus tract and a periapical abscess. 3. Teeth with apical radiolucency greater than 2mm. 4. Teeth with pus or inflammatory exudate draining through the canal. 5. Retreatment cases. 6. Teeth with tooth loss greater than two-thirds of the tooth. 7. Immunocompromised or pregnant or lactating patients. 8. Patients below 18 and above 65 (geriatric patients). 9. Uncooperative and poorly motivated patients. 10. Presence of periodontal pathology e.g., teeth with aggressive periodontitis and grade III mobility. 11. Severe labial or lingual malposed teeth in which obtaining straight-line access would be difficult. 12. Patients with temporomandibular joint problems and trismus that will limit mouth opening. 13. Patients who did not give consent to be part of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative pain was assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours following the intervention to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional irrigation (CI)."

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative facial swelling were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours following the intervention to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional irrigation (CI).

Countries

Nigeria

Contacts

Public ContactAisha NABOYA

Senior registrar

Aishanaboya@gmail.com+2348064870540

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026