Acetyl resin esthetic clasp versus conventional clasp in removable partial denture regarding quality of life

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202505688432814

Enrollment

Registered

2025-05-15

Start date

2023-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health

Interventions

gingivally approaching acetal resin clasps

casted cobalt chromium clasps

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age: 40–60 years • Kennedy Class I mandibular edentulism • Presence of first or second premolar as last standing abutment • Normal maxillo-mandibular relationship • Angle’s Class I ridge relationship • Presence of most opposing maxillary natural teeth • Sufficient intermaxillary space with well-developed ridges • Age: 40–60 years • Kennedy Class I mandibular edentulism • Presence of first or second premolar as last standing abutment • Normal maxillo-mandibular relationship • Angle’s Class I ridge relationship • Presence of most opposing maxillary natural teeth • Sufficient intermaxillary space with well-developed ridges • No signs of mucosal inflammation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Abnormal maxillo-mandibular relationship Angle’s Class II,III ridge relationship signs of mucosal inflammation inSufficient intermaxillary space with well-developed ridges

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHIP-20 )	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
patient satisfaction regarding orofacial pain	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public Contactsherihan salem

lecturer

drsherihansalem@gmail.com01093704816

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026