Cancer
Conditions
Interventions
Breast cancer intervention group
Cervical cancer intervention group
Colorectal cancer intervention group
Sponsors
Jennifer Moodley
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - 18 years old or over - Reside in the selected study areas.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Previous self-reported diagnosis of breast, cervical or colorectal cancer. - Unable to communicate in English, Afrikaans, isiXhosa, Ndebele or Shona. - Unable to provide informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Recall of symptoms. To assess recall of symptoms, an open-ended question will be used: “Please would you name as many symptoms or signs of [breast, cervical, or colorectal] cancer as you can think of?”. Responses will be recorded verbatim and will be coded by two researchers in each country against the list of agreed symptoms in the AWACAN-ED survey instruments. Participants will score ‘1’ if they mention a symptom that corresponds to the list of symptoms, and ‘0’ if they do not mention it and summed to produce total score of the number of recalled symptoms. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Intention to seek help. It will be measured by asking participants to report how soon they would visit the pharmacy or clinic or health centre or hospital, if they noticed symptoms of possible breast, cervical and colorectal cancer with 5 response options (“never”, “less than one week,”, “between a week and one month”, “between a month and three months”, and “three months or more”). Only women will be asked the items about seeking help for breast or cervical symptoms. For analysis, responses will be dichotomised to ‘less than one week’ and ‘more than one week’. ;Emotional impact. To assess the emotional impact of the AWACAN-ED public tools, we will measure state anxiety which is defined as a transitory emotional response to a specific situation. A measure of emotional response to cancer symptoms that has previously been used in the African context was adapted for this study. The scale contains four items on feeling anxious, distressed, concerned, and afraid. The participants select from three response options (“No, not at all”, “Yes, a bit”, “Yes a lot”) which are assigned numerical values (1-3). These values are summed to calculate an anxiety score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of state anxiety. This state anxiety measure will be administered prior to the intervention (T0) and in the first post-intervention questionnaire (T1).;Acceptability of the tools. Participants will be asked how engaging they found the AWACAN-ED tool across five aspects of engagement (appealing, unpleasant, interesting, hard to understand, informative) adapted from previous studies. Response options will include “Agree”; “disagree” and “Don’t know”. Participants will have the opportunity to add further comments or suggestions regarding the AWACAN-ED tool. Responses will be recorded verbatim. These items will only be asked in the first post-intervention questionnaire (T1). | — |
Countries
South Africa, Zimbabwe
Contacts
Public ContactBothwell Takaingofa Guzha
Lecturer Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Harare
Outcome results
None listed