Comparative study between conventional versus stapling hemorrhoidectomy in management of hemorrhoid

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202502619669097

Enrollment

Registered

2025-02-12

Start date

2018-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery

Interventions

conventional hemorrhoidectomy in patients with hemorrhoid

stapled hemorroidectomy in patients with hemorroid

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients with third degree piles patients with fourth degree piles with partial rectal prolapse

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: first- and second-degree hemorrhoids, strangulated or thrombosed piles, concomitant perianal fistula, fissures, abscess, previous anal surgery known history of coagulopathy or receiving treatment with oral anticoagulants or immunosuppressive agents.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the Operative time, Duration of hospitalization, and extent of Postoperative pain.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The incidence of complications includes urine incontinence, bleeding, wound infection, incontinence, recurrence, and perianal fistula. The duration to perform normal daily activities.	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactSamir Ali

Professor of general surgery AlAzhar uiversity Assiut

doctersamir@outlook.com+201063985556

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026