Skip to content

Exploring Emotion Regulation and Mental Health in Older South African Adolescents from Low-Income Settings.

Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of an emotion regulation programme with physical activity elements for at-risk, 15-to-18-year-old South African adolescents from low-income settings.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202412659160564
Enrollment
85
Registered
2024-12-17
Start date
2023-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

The FeelThinkMove Programme

Sponsors

Sue Struengmann Initiative
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Participants had to be between 15-18 years old 2) Participants had to provide written/verbal informed assent/consent 3) Participants had to provide written/verbal informed caregiver consent if < 18 years old 4) Participants had to score = 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) for depression and/or =10 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) for anxiety symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Participants were excluded if they had already taken part in the co-adaptation phase of the study. 2) Participants were excluded if they were currently receiving treatment elsewhere, or were experiencing active suicidality (and were referred for further assessment and/or treatment as needed)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility indicators included acceptability of the intervention and study procedures, recruitment feasibility, data collection appropriateness, programme retention, and facilitator competency. Acceptability of intervention content and delivery was assessed using the adapted Child Evaluation Inventory (scores: 22–110), and study procedures were rated on a separate 5-point Likert scale (scores: 11–55), with higher scores reflecting greater acceptability. Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention was also assessed qualitatively via 45-60 minute semi-structured individual interviews with a sub-sample of adolescents participants who completed the intervention as well as all facilitators and community stakeholders. Facilitator competencies and content fidelity were peer-assessed by facilitators, the lead researcher and an independent rater using the Therapeutic Attributes and Competencies for Teen groups tool and intervention-specific checklists for each session, respectively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Depression was assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents. Anxiety was assessed via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7. Trauma was assessed via the Child and Adolescent Trauma Survey. Emotion regulation was assessed via the Difficulties of Emotion Regulation Scale 16. Self-esteem was assessed via the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Physical activity was assessed via the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents. Alcohol use was assessed via the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Illicit drug use was measured via Drug Use Disorders Identification Test. Nicotine use was measured via the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence.

Countries

South Africa

Contacts

Public ContactChesney Ward Smith

Clinical Psychologist and PhD Fellow

chesneywardsmith157@gmail.com0848300561

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026