Skip to content

comparing early versus delayed oral feeds following caesarean section

A randomized control trial comparing early versus delayed oral feeds following caesarean section

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202409613935522
Enrollment
108
Registered
2024-09-23
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

incidence of paralytic ileus

Interventions

delayed feeding group

Sponsors

Dr. Matthew Sesugh Iorfa
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All women scheduled to undergo elective caesarean section at term under spinal anaesthesia will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had complicated Caesarean section (post-partum haemorrhage, bowel injury, extensive adhesiolysis, caesarean hysterectomy or myomectomy). Women who had spinal anaesthesia converted to general anaesthesia in the course of surgery will be excluded. Women who do not consent to the study will be excluded Women with medical conditions in pregnancy such as severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, diabetes in pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the incidence of paralytic ileus in both study groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
determine the mean ambulation time, total fluid used. Also to determine maternal satisfaction within the two study groups

Countries

Nigeria

Contacts

Public ContactUshakuma Anenga

Fellow West African College of Surgeons

uanenga@yahoo.com+2347031616767

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026