Skip to content

Evaluation the accuracy of Air Puff Tonometer Compared to Goldmann and Schiotz

Evaluation the accuracy of Air Puff Tonometer Compared to Goldmann and Schiotz

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202407522723427
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-07-29
Start date
2024-07-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eye Diseases

Interventions

Measuring intraocular pressure

Sponsors

Faculty of medicine Port Said university
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: History of primary open angle glaucoma.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of secondary open angle glaucoma such as steroid-induced glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. 2. Corneal disorders such as keratitis, corneal ulcer, exposure keratopathy, corneal dystrophy and corneal degeneration. 3. Use of contact lens within 24 hours. 4. Silicon-filled eyes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measuring IOP of 200 patient by GAT, Schiotz and air-puff tonometers.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
After completing the measurement of IOP for 200 patient and comparing the IOP for the 3 devices in glaucoma patients and normal healthy individuals.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactGehad Gamil

Data analyser

gogololojodo@gmail.com+201068498281

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026