Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral pudendal nerve block versus spinal (saddle) anesthesia in hemorrhoidectomy

Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral pudendal nerve block versus spinal (saddle) anesthesia in hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202406621103368

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-28

Start date

2023-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaesthesia

Interventions

Pudendal nerve block

Spinal anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 20 and 60 years Scheduled for elective Milligan–Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Chronic back pain Vertebral or pelvic deformities History of allergy to any drugs used in the study Hemorrhagic diseases Infection at the site of injection Severe liver, kidney, or heart diseases Pregnancy Lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time to first analgesic	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Mean arterial pressure and heart rate;Block failure rate ;Rate of complications, such as pain or infection at the injection site, visceral (e.g. bladder, rectum) injury, or pudendal artery injury	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactAmani Abdelrahman

Department of Anesthesia Surgical ICU and Pain Management Faculty of Medicine Cairo University

amani.abdelrahman@mail.com0000000000000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026