Horizontal Bone Augmentation with Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Ridge Splitting with Sticky Bone Versus Onlay Sticky Bone Graft

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202406616473654

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-07

Start date

2021-06-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health

Interventions

Ridge splitting with simultaneous implant placement

Implant placement with onlay sticky bone graft application

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients exhibiting good health with absence of any relevant medical condition that contraindicate dental implant placement i.e. (ASA I patient) - Optimal compliance as evidenced by no missed treatment appointments and a positive attitude toward performing oral hygiene measures. - Maxillary alveolar ridge with bone density (D3). - Alveolar bone ridge of minimum height of 10 mm and crestal bone width ranges from 3.5 mm to 5 mm..

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Insufficient vertical inter-arch space to accommodate the restorative component. - The presence of severe buccal undercut. - Thin gingival phenotype. - Patients with parafunctional occlusal habits. - Smokers and pregnant women.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Horizontal ridge augmentation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
marginal bone level	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactElsayedamr Basma

Patient Information Manager

elsayedamr@yahoo.com00201223106023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026