The effect of music-based strength proprioceptive training on physical and cognitive performance among adolescents with visual impairment

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202402852117450

Enrollment

Registered

2024-02-20

Start date

2023-01-16

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Visual impairment

Interventions

strength proprioceptive training

Music strength proprioceptive training

Control group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adolescents: age between12-19years old Severe visual impairment (Visual acuity between 6/60 and 3/60 in the better eye)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants with neurological, vestibular, orthopedic or musculoskeletal problems Participants who were participate in a physical rehabilitations program or a musicotherapy intervention in the last year Medication use that could interfere with testing

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary outcome consisted on the evaluation of the physical and the cognitive performance. According to the physical performance evaluation - The static postural balance was evaluated using the stabilometric platform (postureWin©, Techno Concept ®,Cereste, France; 40 Hz frequency,12-bits A/D conversion) and the single leg stance clinical test and the dynamic postural balance using the Timed Up and Go Test TUGT. - The lower limb muscle strength was evaluated using a connected electronic traction dynamometer (K-Force® Link, KINVENT, Montpellier, France) and the Sit to Stand clinical test. -The lower limb muscle power was evaluated by the squat jump and countermovement jump tests using the infrared timing system (Optojump Next, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). Indeed, we evaluated the lower limb endurance by the killy test and the risk of falls by the functional reach test. The cognitive performance was evaluated by the auditory reaction time using the Inquisit 6 Millisecond Software (version 6.6.1) and by the letter fluency test and the Serial subtraction test.	—

Measure

Time frame

The primary outcome consisted on the evaluation of the physical and the cognitive performance. According to the physical performance evaluation - The static postural balance was evaluated using the stabilometric platform (postureWin©, Techno Concept ®,Cereste, France; 40 Hz frequency,12-bits A/D conversion) and the single leg stance clinical test and the dynamic postural balance using the Timed Up and Go Test TUGT. - The lower limb muscle strength was evaluated using a connected electronic traction dynamometer (K-Force® Link, KINVENT, Montpellier, France) and the Sit to Stand clinical test. -The lower limb muscle power was evaluated by the squat jump and countermovement jump tests using the infrared timing system (Optojump Next, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). Indeed, we evaluated the lower limb endurance by the killy test and the risk of falls by the functional reach test. The cognitive performance was evaluated by the auditory reaction time using the Inquisit 6 Millisecond Software (version 6.6.1) and by the letter fluency test and the Serial subtraction test.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Anthropometric data, including age, sex, weight, and height, were collected from each participant through anamnesis. Additionally, clinical parameters related to visual impairment were obtained through a combination of anamnesis and review of medical records	—

Countries

Tunisia

Contacts

Public ContactHana maatoug

LR19JS01

hana06@yahoo.com+21626282023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026