Skip to content

A Comparative Assessment of Ocular Prostheses Motility in Atrophia Bulbi Versus Implanted Anophthalmic Sockets (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

A Comparative Assessment of Ocular Prostheses Motility in Atrophia Bulbi Versus Implanted Anophthalmic Sockets (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202306612520344
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-06-20
Start date
2023-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eye Diseases

Interventions

Customized Atrophia
Ready made Atrophia
Customized Implanted
Ready made Implanted

Sponsors

Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with unilateral missing eye with either atrophia bulbi or implanted anopthalamic socket. Have enough ocular bed to accommodate the ocular prosthesis. At least 15 days after surgery to allow complete healing of the socket.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients under steroid therapy or those under radio or chemotherapy. Patients having eye lid deformity. History of psychological disorder. systemic disease. eye infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ocular motility

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction score

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactElsayedamr Basma

Patient Information Manager

elsayedamr@yahoo.com00201223106023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026