repaire of uretropelvic junction obstruction

Prospective randomised comparative study between ureter first approach and traditional open Anderson-Hyenes pyeloplasty.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202301585882096

Enrollment

Registered

2023-01-16

Start date

2022-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urological and Genital Diseases

Interventions

anterior wall first approach

traditional

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with primary Uretero-pelvic junction obstruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients underwent previous repair. Uncorrectable coagulopathy & untreated UTI. Patients with other congenital urological anomalies.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison between anterior wall first technique and conventional open Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty as regard feasibility, duration of operation, efficacy, and complications.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
anterior wall first technique and conventional open Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty as regard feasibility, efficacy, and complications.	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactHesham elsayed

lecturer of urology Faculty of medicine AlAzhar University

Aboziedhesham@gmail.com01062087567

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026