Skip to content

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MOLAR BANDS VERSUS BONDED TUBES ON PERIODONTAL STATUS AND ATTACHMENT FAILURES IN AN ORTHODONTIC POPULATION

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MOLAR BANDS VERSUS BONDED TUBES ON PERIODONTAL STATUS AND ATTACHMENT FAILURES IN AN ORTHODONTIC POPULATION

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202208919526312
Enrollment
52
Registered
2022-08-30
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal disease

Interventions

Buccal tube in fixed orthodontics appliance
Molar bands

Sponsors

Dr. Chegwe
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patients who were about to undergo fixed appliance orthodontic therapy (Pre-adjusted Edgewise) in both arches. • Patients: adolescents aged 10-17 years and adult patients aged 18-35 years. • Motivated and well informed patients. Information about the study were adequately communicated to patients and parents (with regard to adolescent patients). An informed consent form were obtained from these selected patients (Appendix 1) while Assent for under-aged patients.(Appendix 2) • Patients with no pre-existing periodontal disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients below 10 years or above 35 years. • Patients with history of Diabetes mellitus, blood dyscrasias or periodontitis. • Patients with other systemic diseases including cardiovascular diseases receiving anti-hypertensive medication among others. • Patients on antibiotics 3 months prior to treatment. • Patients requiring arch expansion (Occlusion that requires extra-oral and intra-oral anchorage reinforcement devices e.g., Nance, Transpalatal arch, Lingual holding arch). • Patients requiring distalization of the molars with other appliances. These were excluded to avoid other interferences of the oral flora during the course of this study so as not to affect the result obtained. • Patients with missing first permanent molars. • Patients with hypoplastic or demineralized molars. • Molars with heavy restorations or crowns. • Non-consenting patients. • Pregnant women. • Females on oral contraceptives. • Patients with para functional oral habits like bruxism • Patients with special needs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Plaque accumulation, Gingival inflammation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Detachment from the teeth.

Countries

Nigeria

Contacts

Public ContactGerald Isiekwe

supervisor

iisiekwe@unilag.edu.ng+2348052930439

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026