Skip to content

Does the use of the Informed Health Choices teaching resources improve the secondary students’ ability to critically think about health in Uganda? A cluster randomized trial protocol

Does the use of the Informed Health Choices teaching resources improve the secondary students’ ability to critically think about health in Uganda? A cluster randomized trial protocol

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202204861458660
Enrollment
6080
Registered
2022-04-14
Start date
2022-05-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical thinking about health. All the treatments for all conditions/illnesses we experience

Interventions

Be smart about your health
Teaching the national standard curriculum

Sponsors

Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We will include secondary schools that have a lower (ordinary) level section that teaches the national curriculum. Only schools for which the head teacher and teachers provide written consent to participate and own a smart phone will be included in the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: We will exclude special needs schools for students with auditory and visual impairments, schools that participated in user-testing and piloting of the IHC learning resources, and adult only education schools (Schools where individual usually over the age of 18 years go for secondary education).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure is the proportion of children with a passing score on the Critical Thinking about Health Test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• mean score (percentage of correct answers) on the evaluation tool used to measure the students’ ability to apply the key concepts addressed by the intervention • proportion of students with a score indicating mastery of the concepts • proportion of students who answer both questions correctly for each of the nine concepts • students’ intended behaviours and self-efficacy measured using questions added on the Critical Thinking about Health Test. • self-reported behaviours • overall academic performance in O-level compulsory subjects: biology, chemistry, physics, mathematics, english, history & political education, and geography. This will be collected for the term prior to the when the intervention is delivered, at the end of the term after the intervention de-livery and at one year after the intervention delivery. • proportion of teachers with a passing score, their mean score, and the proportion with a score indicating mastery of the concepts using the same evaluation tool used to measure the students’ ability to apply the key concepts addressed by the intervention

Countries

Uganda

Contacts

Public ContactNelson Sewankambo

Supervisor Professor of Medicine

sewankam@infocom.co.ug+256782366751

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026