Skip to content

Is there a difference in long term effect of radial shockwave versus phonophoresis on ultrasonography and clinical outcome in chronic plantar fasciitis

LONG TERM EFFECT OF RADIAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY VERSUS PHONOPHORESIS IN CHRONIC PLANTAR FASCIITIS: “RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY”

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202203539689555
Enrollment
63
Registered
2022-03-07
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

extracorporeal shock wave phonophoresis
phonophoresis and conventional treatment
Conventional treatment

Sponsors

mohamed mohamed mashaly
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1- A clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis 2- Plantar heel pain for longer than 3 months; 3- First-step pain in the morning during the previous week rated at least 2 on the numeric pain rating scale 4-Aged 30-50 years or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1-A history of surgery to the ankle, foot or lower leg. 2-Potential contraindications to shockwave or phonphoresis. 3-Had received conservative treatment (i.e. physical therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, chiropractic treatment or local steroid injections) for PF in the previous 4 weeks. 4- Presented with 2 or more positive neurologic signs consistent with nerve root compression. 5- Other causes of heel pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1- plantat fascia thickness ;2- visual analogue scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
lower limb functional scale

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public Contactyasser lasheen

professor of basic science faculty of physical therapy Cairo university

dr_yasser_1977@yahoo.com00201005251562

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026