Effectiveness of Eye-Cervical Re-education Versus Motor Imagery Therapy on Chronic Neck Pain : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Eye-Cervical Re-education Versus Motor Imagery Therapy on Chronic Neck Pain

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202111856730525

Enrollment

Registered

2021-11-12

Start date

2021-08-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

Conventional physical therapy

Eye Cervical Re education program

Motor Imagery therapy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age will range from 20 to 45 years 2. Patients of both sexes. 3. Neck pain diagnosed by physician greater than 3 months in duration. 4.Active or latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in at least one of the following muscles: upper trapezius, levator scapulae, or splenius capitis. Both active and latent MTrPs were considered because latent MTrPs have been associated with the development of sensory motor dysfunction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Dizziness syndrome. 2. Post-traumatic as whiplash 3. Neurological, infectious, or tumor cervical pain. 4. Pregnant women. 5. Patients having speech and understanding problems. 6. Past history of neck surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
CROM device to measure cervical ROM , Proprioception neutral , target head;pain pressure threshold by pressure algometer device	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
pain intensity level by VAS ;Scapular Protraction by tap measurement ; cervical function by The Arabic Version Of The Neck Functional Disability Scale	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactRanda Amin

Bachelor of physical therapy

Randaamin1311@hotmail.com+201013939174

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026