Skip to content

Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block: A randomized controlled trial

Open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block at Kampala International University Teaching Hospital: A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202110667430356
Enrollment
58
Registered
2021-10-08
Start date
2021-11-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Digestive System

Interventions

Group A
Group B

Sponsors

Katembo Sikakulya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients aged between 18-65 years Uncomplicated 3rd or 4th degree hemorrhoids Classify by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Documented contraindication of spinal anesthesia such as chronic backache and spinal deformities, previous perianal surgery, known history of allergy to the drugs used in the study, Bleeding disorders 3rd or 4th degree thrombosed hemorrhoids, Active inflammatory bowel disease, Pregnancy, Documented neoplasm situated distal aspect of the large bowel or rectum, Liver diseases with portal hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of pain following open hemorrhoidectomy will be determined in both groups using the Visual analogue Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean operative time of open hemorrhoidectomy in both groups

Countries

Uganda

Contacts

Public ContactOkedi Francis Xaviour

Supervisor

okedifrancisxaviour@gmail.com+256772196223

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026