Skip to content

Effectiveness of Ketofol versus Propofol Induction on Hemodynamic Profiles in Adult Elective Surgical Patients: - A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effectiveness of Ketofol versus Propofol Induction on Hemodynamic Profiles in Adult Elective Surgical Patients: - A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202008628465772
Enrollment
125
Registered
2020-08-18
Start date
2020-08-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaesthesia

Interventions

Propofol

Sponsors

Dilla University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - ASA I and II - Age 18-65 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Obstetric, Neurosurgical and ENT surgery are excluded - Those on long time opioid use/ sedative preoperative adjunctive medications - Those who use psychotropic drugs - any known contraindications/allergy to ketamine or propofol - pre-operative anxious patients - patient in pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Our primary endpoints were a change in hemodynamic parameters (MAP, SBP, and HR) from baseline immediately after induction, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 25 minutes, and 30 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints include postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting incident was graded and recorded in the PACU.

Countries

Ethiopia

Contacts

Public ContactSileshi Hailu

first advisor

abebihailu911@gmail.com+2510913785100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026