Skip to content

Efficacy of interactive video gaming in older adults with memory complaints

Efficacy of interactive video gaming in older adults with memory complaints

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202008547335106
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-08-20
Start date
2016-05-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Memory Complaints

Interventions

Interactive Video Gaming
Conventional Multimodal Supervised Exercise

Sponsors

University of Cape Town
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals aged 65 years and older with subjective and objective memory complaints and residing in a retirement home were eligible. We adapted the Petersen criterion for MCI to determine subjective and objective memory complaints in older adults not clinically diagnosed with MCI. Individuals were eligible to participate in the study if they met all 5 of the criteria Subjective memory complaints, Objective memory impairment, Intact daily function, Normal cognitive function (Adapted Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)) and Non-demented)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Older adults who had been previously diagnosed with a stroke, Parkinson’s disease, balance disorders, impaired vision or had uncontrolled conditions such as hypertension (blood pressure more than 160/90 and not on medication) or diabetes (not on medication) were excluded from the study. Those with orthopaedic injuries which inhibited normal locomotion were also excluded. The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) was used as the first line of screening for participant’s entry into the study. Those who were identified as being at an increased risk for coronary artery disease, according to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) criteria, required consent from a doctor to allow them to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Global Cognitive Function

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Executive Function;Working Memory;6 Minute Walk test;Dynamic Balance;Timed Up and Go test;Functional Reach test

Countries

South Africa

Contacts

Public ContactUdhir Ramnath

Student

rmnudh001@myuct.ac.za+27738000973

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026