Skip to content

The comparative effect of dry needling versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of active rhomboid trigger points.

The comparative effect of dry needling versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of active rhomboid trigger points.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202006473495513
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-06-04
Start date
2020-03-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

Ultrasound Therapy
Dry Needling
not applicable

Sponsors

University of Johannesburg Health Science Chiroparctic Department
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants are either male or female aged between 18-50 years old –reason for a minimum age of 18 so that parental consent is avoided, and participants can sign their own consent forms, and the maximum age of 50 is to avoid degenerative changes that may be present. Participants presenting with active rhomboid trigger point pain Rhomboid Trigger point diagnosis according to the following criteria: Presence of hyperirritable palpable nodule within a taut band of muscle. Spot tenderness over the palpable nodule With a pain referral along the vertebral border of scapula between the scapula and Paraspinal muscles. It may spread upwards to the spinous portion of the scapula and pain patterns resemble that of the levator scapulae muscle but without the neck component and without restriction to neck rotation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants with any contraindication to ultrasound therapy obtained on case history and physical examination Participants with any contraindications to dry needling obtained on case history and physical examination Participants receiving any other form of treatment such as physiotherapy, other chiropractic treatment or any medication, such as muscle relaxants, analgesics or anti-inflammatories that will interfere with the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Possible outcomes of this study will determine whether dry needling of the rhomboids or ultrasound of the rhomboids is the more effective treatment, or whether the same results are yielded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
If same results are yielded as effective treatments, due to the rhomboids being closely situated to the lungs, this will help give alternatives of a different treatment approach for patients who are afraid of needles, or have contraindications to either of the two treatment methods. This may be beneficial to the profession in establishing an effective treatment protocol for trigger points.

Countries

South Africa

Contacts

Public ContactChris Yelverton

Head of Department

chrisy@uj.ac.za+21115596646

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026