Combined transvaginal sonoelastography and abdominal ultrasound versus Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of cancer cervix: RCT

Combined transvaginal sonoelastography and abdominal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of cancer cervix: randomized controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202005672126095

Enrollment

400

Registered

2020-05-14

Start date

2018-01-16

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer cervix

Interventions

combined transvaginal sonoelastography and abdominopelvic ultrasound then MRI

MRI then combined transvaginal sonoelastography and abdominopelvic ultrasound after crossover

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: suspicious cervical lesions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: cervical lesions extending to the vagina

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Diagnosis of suspicious cervical lesions	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Diagnosis of parametrial involvement of cases of cancer cervix	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactHaitham Torky

October 6th University

haithamtorky@yahoo.com+201001230161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026