Skip to content

Efficacy of Clomipramine for chronic lumbar radicular pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Efficacy of Clomipramine for chronic lumbar radicular pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202001764151121
Enrollment
62
Registered
2020-01-14
Start date
2019-05-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

Sponsors

El Ayachi Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: male and female participants aged 20-80 years with chronic lumbar radicular pain whatever the etiology, defined as pain lumbosacral radicular radiating into the leg below the knee, which had been present for greater than 3 months, with VAS pain= 6/10, and which was not improved by NSAIDs, analgesics and physical treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) a specific spinal pathological entity such as infection, inflammatory or tumor pathology, or fractures, (2) spinal surgery within the last 4 weeks, (3) a coexisting major disease for which clomipramine may be inappropriate: glaucoma, urinary problems, recent myocardial infarction, convulsions, (4) any current use of other antidepressants, (5) current use of recommended full and regular doses of another analgesic, (6) allergy or contraindication for experimental drugs, (7) pregnancy, planning or trying to become pregnant or breastfeeding. All participants will benefit from an initial cardiac evaluation. We will also exclude all subjects with a major cardiovascular risk factor or cardiac pathology with risk of decompensation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pain intensity using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 10 mm, scale where patients will be asked to estimate their current pain, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) changes in neuropathic pain symptoms, measured with the DN4 : douleur neuropathic questionnaire, scores ranging from 0 to 10, greater scores sign more neuropathic pain symptoms are present, Cutoff =4 [15]. 2) lumbar radicular discomfort measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 10 mm. 3) pain-free perimeter of walking, where participants were asked to estimate how long can they walk without pain, calculated by minutes. 4) Disability by using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) [16], a 24-item instrument designed to assess self-rated low back disability, (0 indicates no functional impairment; 24 indicates maximum functional impairment). 5) severity of mood symptoms by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD), an instrument for detecting anxiety and depressive disorders, it comprises 14 items rated from 0 to 3 : Seven questions relate to anxiety and seven others to the depressive dimension, thus allowing two scores to be obtained (scores ranging from 0 to 21 of each score), with higher scores (=11) indicating certain sympomatology, 8 to 10 : doubtful symptomatology, =7 : absence of symptomatology [17]. 6) spinal mobility was assessed using Schober’s index (cm) and Finger to Floor Distance (FFD) (cm).

Countries

Morocco

Contacts

Public ContactRedouane Abouqal

Laboratory of Biostatistics Clinical Research and Epidemiology Rabat

Redouane.abouqal@yahoo.fr+212613734606

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026