Skip to content

Mulligan versus thoracic manipulation on mechanical neck pain

Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides versus thoracic manipulation on mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202001587283053
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-01-14
Start date
2019-06-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

Conventional physical therapy program

Sponsors

Faculty of physical therapy Cairo university
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1- Patients aged from 18-45 years old. 2- Patients who were diagnosed with primary complaint of neck pain as referred by physician. 3- Consent to participate in the study and follow the treatment schedule.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any known case of cervical spine canal stenosis. 2. Previous history of malignancy. 3. History of whiplash injury, within 6 weeks of examination. 4. Any past history of cervico-thoracic surgery. 5. Patients with history of fractures of cervical and thoracic spine. 6. Patients diagnosed with, cervicogenic headache and vertigo. 7. Exposure to acute trauma. 8. Having history of inflammatory joint, muscle disease or infection. 9. Having an evidence of neurological deficit. 10. Exhibiting inadequate cooperation. 11. Having a diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cervical range of motion by CROM

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain By pressure algometer, visual analogue scale and neck disability index

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactNabil AbdelAal

Lecturer of physical therapy

nabil.mahmoud@cu.edu.eg01200133613

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026