Comparison of Post Radical Mastectomy Analgesic Effect of PEC Block versus Wound Instillation through Surgical Drains with Bupivacaine. A Prospective, Randomized Double Blind Study

Comparison of Post Radical Mastectomy Analgesic Effect of PEC Block versus Wound Instillation through Surgical Drains with Bupivacaine. A Prospective, Randomized Double Blind Study.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201912852261514

Enrollment

100

Registered

2019-12-06

Start date

2019-05-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaesthesia

Interventions

Group A

Group B

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Female patients undergoing radical mastectomy for breast cancer. • ASA 1 and 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients with a history of clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, neurologic, psychiatric or metabolic disease. • Patients with a history of chronic analgesic drug usage. • Distant Metastasis. • Allergy to local anaesthetics or any included medications.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Compare the duration of analgesia resulting from local anesthetic installation into the wound through surgical drains versus regional PEC2 block in radical mastectomy.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Compare the analgesic rescue frequency and total dose given in both groups as well as comparing the complications that might occur from each analgesic technique.	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactAmin Ahmed

professor Alexandrai university

aminrazek@yahoo.com00201227392464

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026