Skip to content

The effectiveness of knee and hip mobilisation versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners

The effectiveness of knee and hip mobilisation versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201911521746016
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-11-06
Start date
2020-01-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

Knee and hip mobilisation
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
Knee and hip mobilisation and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation
Not applicable

Sponsors

University of Johannesburg Health Science Ethics Committee
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Males and females 18-50 years old. The reason for the minimum age of 18 is so that parental consent is avoided, meaning all participants will be able to sign their own consent form. The reason for the maximum age of 50 is to avoid any degenerative changes that may be present in the knee joint which is a normal part of aging Runners who run a minimum of 10km a week Runners who are symptomatic with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome for longer than six weeks Be able to be treated six times in a three-week period with an additional 7th time to do the last recording of pain and muscle strength

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Contra-indications to Chiropractic mobilisation therapy Acute knee pain of less than six weeks Trauma to the knee in last six months (e.g. Falling directly onto knee, motor vehicle accident) Unable to make prescribed schedule of treatments Knee surgery Participants who are currently taking analgesics or anti-inflammatories as this may interfere with the results of the study Participants who are receiving other forms of treatment that may interfere with the results of the study, including manual therapy such as massage and physiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The possible outcomes of this research study could indicate which of the three groups of runners has the most improvement of pain and symptoms and which treatment protocol may be the most successful in treating PFPS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The results of this research study may help guide Chiropractors and other physical therapists as to which protocol may be the most effective.

Countries

South Africa

Contacts

Public ContactChris Yelverton

Head of department

chrisy@uj.ac.za+27115596646

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026