Figaro Crowns versus Stainless Steel Crowns in Primary molars

Fiberglass Posterior Crowns “Figaro Crowns” versus Stainless Steel Crowns in Pulp Treated Primary Molars in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201909918553224

Enrollment

Registered

2019-09-17

Start date

2019-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health

Interventions

Fiberglass Figaro Crowns

Stainless Steel Crowns

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy children who need complete oral rehabilitation under general anesthesia Each child should have at least one pair or 2 pairs of their primary molars that need pulpotomy and crown restoration, Teeth selected were with deep carious lesion, vital with healthy periodontium and restorable crowns.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Un-restorable teeth due to massive crown destruction Massive sub-gingival decay that may interfere with crown preparation and retention Clinical signs or symptoms suggesting a non-vital tooth such as suppurating sinus, soft tissue swelling, mobility. Radiographic signs showing: widening of periodontal ligament (PDL), internal root resorption (IRR), pathological external root resorption, periapical or inter radicular radiolucency.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Crown retention;Marginal integrity	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Parents preference to type of crown	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactElsayedamr Basma

Patient Information Manager

elsayedamr@yahoo.com00201223106023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026