Skip to content

Automatic vs Low Flow Manual Control of End Tidal Inhalational Anaesthetics Concentration During liver Resection among Cirrhotic Patients

Automatic vs Low Flow Manual Control of End Tidal Inhalational Anaesthetics Concentration During liver Resection among Cirrhotic Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201907566720877
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-07-29
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaesthesia

Interventions

Manual anasthesia
Automatic Gas Control

Sponsors

national liver institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult liver cirrhotic patients aged 18 to 60 year undergoing liver resection. 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-II 3. Child Pugh Classification A or B

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any central nervous system disease. 2. Severe haemodynamic instability during surgery. 3. Patients in need for re-operation. 4. Unwilling to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
evaluate the Economic impactof adopting the AGC software compared to the manual low flow anaesthetic technique on inhalational agent consumption (ml/h), (both guided by an anesthesia depth monitor), and Sodalime consumption during major liver resection

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Effect of AGC on systemic haemodynamics, number of Anaesthesist interventions (button press), the safety and incidence of hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, the ability to preserve temperature during surgery and in recovery

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public Contacthanaa rashed

lecturer of anasthesia

hanaarashed2020@yahoo.com01001378542

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026