Skip to content

Influence of Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation on Median Nerve Conduction Velocity and Mechanical Pain Threshold: A Randomized Single Blind Controlled Trial

Influence of Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation on Median Nerve Conduction Velocity and Mechanical Pain Threshold: A Randomized Single Blind Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201907468058636
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-07-24
Start date
2016-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

nerve conduction velocity

Interventions

Sponsors

Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Smoker Diabetes Previous injury to the upper limbs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The study included testing of motor and sensory conduction velocity studies motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV). All measurements were done under standard room temperature of 25°C. The participants were informed about the sensation they were going to experience during the EMG measurement. The skin under the stimulating, recording and ground electrodes was cleaned with alcohol to reduce the skin resistance, gel was applied to electrodes for good conduction and electrodes were fixed firmly with adhesive tape

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
A pressure algometer (Pain Diagnostics and Treatment Inc, Italy) was used to quantify the pressure pain threshold (PPT The PPT was the amount of pressure in pounds (lb) that each participant immediately perceived as painful, the measurement point was standardized midway between two stimulating electrodes. Once the initial contact was made, the manual force was applied perpendicularly onto the skin through the circular probe head (1 cm2 surface area) of the algometer. The force was increased at a steady rate until the PPT was registered. PPT was determined by the subject’s verbal report when a pain sensation was elicited. As participants were instructed to say "Stop" when the pressure became painful. PPT was measured before MES application and immediately after, and after 30 min of MES application. The mean of three successive measurements was taken for each study time

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactSalaheldin B. Elsayed

Assistant Professor Basic sciences for Physical Therapy Cairo University

utcsalah@cu.edu.eg+201115018299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026