Skip to content

High Intensity Laser versus Low Intensity Pulse Ultrasound on Pain, Range of motion, Posi-tion Sense and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized c

High Intensity Laser versus Low Intensity Pulse Ultrasound on Pain, Range of motion, Position Sense and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201806003443167
Enrollment
85
Registered
2018-06-02
Start date
2017-04-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases Osteoarthritis Orthopaedics

Interventions

High intensity laser plus a selected exercise program
Low intensity pulsed ultrasound plus a selected exercise program

Sponsors

Soheir Shehata Samaan
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We recruited 84 participants who visit the outpatient clinic regularly for physical therapy treatment, 10 of them were not matched to the inclusion criteria and 4 did not agreed to be continue participation in the study. 70 participants were eligible; 30 male and 40 female, their ages ranged from 25 to 45 years. They were simply randomized and assigned to three groups; randomization was implemented by means of a computer-generated randomized table using the SPSS program (IBM, USA) prepared in advance to data collec¬tion. A certain identification number was assigned for every participant. These numbers were randomized into three groups. Individual and sequentially numbered index cards were secured in opaque envelopes. Each participant was given a hand-picked envelope and was relocated accordingly to their treatment groups. The 3 groups were: HILT group consisted of 25 participants (13 females and 12 males) received HILT plus selected exercises, the LIPUS group consisted of 23 participants (14 females and 9 males) received LIPUS and the selected exercises, or the control group consisted of 22 participants (13 females and 9 males) received exercises only.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects were excluded if they had: acute infective arthritis rheumatoid arthritis any other type of arthritis history of recent knee trauma unreliable patients mentally or physically metabolic disorders fibromyalgia or other chronic pain syndromes; patient put on anti-coagulant/anti-platelet therapy; arthroscopy or invasive knee surgeries in the previous 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS scores (pain), range of motion and proprioceptive accuracy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional disability of the knee joint

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactSoheir Samaan

Assistant professor, Basic science department, faculty of physical therapy, Cairo University.

soheirsamaan@yahoo.com01224003374

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026