Skip to content

Erector Spinae Block

Erector spinae plane block: Is it a simple alternative to paravertebral block in modified radical mastectomy ?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201805003353131
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-04-27
Start date
2018-04-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Surgery Breast cancer surgery

Interventions

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Sponsors

Alexandria University, Faculty of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II, aged 40-65 years and scheduled for modified radical mastectomy at Alexandria main university hospitals

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded if they have long standing diabetes mellitus (> 5 years), any allergy to the study drugs, local infection at any of the puncture sites, any coagulation disorder or any neurological or psychological problem which may affect proper subjective interpretation of the results

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
learning curve of the ESPB technique compared with the paravertebral among senior anesthesia residents

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoint is to assess the two techniques regarding the hemodynamic response to skin incision and intensity of postoperative analgesia in terms of the VAS score, 1st postoperative analgesic requirement and the total postoperative opioid consumption. Any adverse effects related to the regional anesthetic technique will also be documented

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactMaha Ghanem

Head of Ethics committee, Alexandria Facultyof Medicine, Alexandria University

alexmedethics@yahoo.com+201287740750

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026