Skip to content

Posterior root canal treatment outcome and antibacterial efficacy using conventional irrigation versus combined with passive ultrasonic irrigation

Posterior root canal treatment outcome and antibacterial efficacy employing conventional irrigation alone versus combined with passive ultrasonic irrigation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201805003296247
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-04-05
Start date
2017-05-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health Irreversible pulpitis, apical periodontitis

Interventions

Sponsors

Adedayo Oreoluwa Lawal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Posterior teeth except the third molars requiring root canal treatment due to irreversible pulpitis, pulp necrosis, traumatic pulpal exposure. Teeth with apical periodontitis with none or minimal (0-2mm) periapical radiolucency. Presence of none or mild to moderate pain. Permanent teeth with closed apex. Presence of favorable tooth morphology (absence of pulp stones and sclerosis, excessive root curvature). Restorable tooth following root canal treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth which are deemed unrestorable. Teeth which have had previous endodontic treatment. Teeth with open apices. Acute apical periodontitis with severe pain on percussion. Teeth with apical lesion that are asymptomatic and no sinus tract. Symptomatic non-vital teeth with periapical radiolucency and no sinus tract. Presence of cysts. Patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Teeth with unfavorable morphology. Teeth with internal or external root resorption. Patients with debilitating medical conditions. Periodontally compromised teeth. Teeth requiring surgical endodontics. Patients with acute apical abscess that would require incision and drainage. Presence of weeping canal(s) that cannot be dried. Patients who have received antibiotic therapy within the last three months. Uncooperative, poorly motivated, and patients not interested in being part of the research.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The comparison of the reduction in bacterial colony forming units between the experimental and control groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the incidence of pain, swelling,mobility, sinus tract and loss of function between the experimental and control groups.;Comparison of pre-operative and post-operative radiographic changes between the experimental and control groups.

Countries

Nigeria

Contacts

Public ContactDonna Umesi

Associate Professor/ Consultant

ukchioma@yahoo.com+234 802 302 1700

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026