Implant Supported and Tooth-Implant Supported versus Teeth Supported Zirconia : Evaluation of Wear, Internal Adaptation and Marginal accuracy

Implant Supported and Tooth-Implant Supported versus Teeth Supported Zirconia Fixed Restorations: Evaluation of Wear, Internal Adaptation and Marginal Accuracy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201803003201320

Enrollment

Registered

2018-03-15

Start date

2016-05-17

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health Wear, Internal Adaptation and Marginal Accuracy

Interventions

implants- supported monolithic zirconia and teeth-implant supported monolithic zirconia

teeth-supported monolithic zirconia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.At least 18 years old, can read and sign the informed consent document. 2.Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures. 3.Have no any systemic disorders. 4.Patients with teeth missing problems indicated for implant supported fixed restoration. 5.Be willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation. 2.Pregnant women. 3.Patient under drug therapy. 4.Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. 5.Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration. ¿6.¿Heavy Smoker patients.¿

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Evaluate natural enamel wear	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
evaluate marginal accuracy;Evaluate internal adaptation	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactProf. Dr Manal Abo Madina

Professor

a711482260@gmail.com00201280308033

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026