Absorbable collagen wound dressing versus oxidized regenerated cellulose on palatal wound healing

Effect of absorbable collagen wound dressing versus oxidized regenerated cellulose on palatal wound healing (A randomized controlled trial)

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201803003152150

Enrollment

Registered

2018-02-27

Start date

2018-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health Palatal wound healing after free palatal graft

Interventions

CollaCote

Surgicel FibrillarTM

PeriAcryl 90 high viscosity

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients having at least one site of natural dentition or dental implants that needs to be treated by free palatal graft surgery for indications including progressive recession, planned prosthodontics, mucogingival deformity, or lack of keratinized gingiva. Patients age ranging from 20 to 50 years to avoid possible hormonal effects on soft tissue healing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of smoking. Patients having any known disease that interferes with periodontal surgery. Patients having dermal or autoimmune disease. Patients having previous adverse reaction to the products (or similar products) used in this study. Pregnant and lactating women. Patients having palatal infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Palatal wound healing after free palatal graft surgery using photo-digital planimetry	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain after harvesting free palatal grafts from palatal donor sites utilizing Visual Analogue Scale (VAS	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactElsayedamr Basma

Patient Information Manager

elsayedamr@yahoo.com00201223106023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026