Skip to content

Conventional Fixed Tongue Crib versus Mini-screw Supported Tongue Crib in the Treatment of Patients in mixed dentition

Treatment effects of Conventional Fixed Tongue Crib versus Mini-screw Supported Tongue Crib in the Treatment of Patients in mixed dentition stage with Anterior Open Bite: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201801002981142
Enrollment
26
Registered
2018-01-17
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health Tongue Crib

Interventions

Conventional Fixed Tongue Crib
Mini-screw Supported Tongue Crib

Sponsors

Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Class I skeletal and dental Dental anterior open bite Maxillary and mandibular central incisor and lower first molars erupted Tongue thrust habit Good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemic disease Severe crowding Missing teeth Previous orthodontic treatment Presence of posterior crossbites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Parents¿ satisfaction

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Open-bite correction;Amount of permanent maxillary first molar antero-posterior movement and tipping;Soft tissue changes

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactAhmed Fouda

Lecturer assistant

ahmed.fouda@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201226226626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026