Can novel airway devices attenuate hemodynamic stress response to endotracheal intubation? A comparative study between the King Vision Video Laryngosc

Can novel airway devices attenuate hemodynamic stress response to endotracheal intubation? A comparative study between the King Vision Video Laryngoscope and glidescope.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201712002869388

Enrollment

Registered

2017-12-14

Start date

2018-01-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

endotracheal intubation

Interventions

kingvision intubation

glidoscope intubation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients with ASA I and II,Aged 18-60 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients refusal,difficult intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary outcomes were time to intubation and rate of successful intubation.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary outcomes were the percent of glottic opening and Cormack-Lehane grade visualized.	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public Contactdoaaelamrousy elamrousy

aasistant professor in tanta university hospital

doaamoha@yahoo.com00101222364989

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026