EFFICACY AND SATISFACTION OF THE MIRACLEFEET VERSUS STEENBEEK FOOT ABDUCTION BRACE DURING PONSETI TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC CLUBFOOT IN MWANZA, SUPERIOR

EFFICACY AND SATISFACTION OF THE MIRACLEFEET VERSUS STEENBEEK FOOT ABDUCTION BRACE DURING PONSETI TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC CLUBFOOT IN MWANZA, SUPERIORITY CLINICAL TRAL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201708002399768

Enrollment

160

Registered

2017-07-01

Start date

2017-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy and Childbirth Paediatrics IDIOPATHIC CONGENITAL TALIPES EQUINOVARUS

Interventions

miraclefeet foot abduction brace

steenbeek foot abduction brace

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Unilateral or bilateral cases idiopathic clubfoot in children less than 2 years of age, receiving a brace for the first time.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ¿ Children treated with surgery other than tenotomy ¿ Syndromic or neuropathic cases of clubfoot; atypical clubfoot.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
clubfoot deformity recurrence requiring re casting or re tenotomy.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
parent satisfaction	—

Countries

Tanzania

Contacts

Public ContactSTEPHEN SWETALA

Principal investigator

stephenswetala@gmail.com+255 757 58 27 87

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026