Skip to content

suprazygomatic versus infrazygomatic maxillary nerve block

Feasibility and Efficiency of ultrasound guided bilateral suprazygomatic versus infrazygomatic maxillary nerve block for cleft palate repair in children

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201707002362380
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-06-19
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery Paediatrics postoperative pain Anaesthesia

Interventions

Ultrasound guided bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block. (SMB)
Ultrasound guided bilateral infrazygomatic maxillary nerve block

Sponsors

Tanta University, Faculty of Medicine
Lead Sponsor
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical ICU, Tanta University
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: aged 3 months - 2 years either gender ASA I-II scheduled for surgical cleft palate repair

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lack of parental consent patients with allergy to local anesthetic cutaneous infection wound close to the puncture point

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The feasibility and efficiency of bilateral ultrasound guided suprazygomatic versus infrazygomatic maxillary nerve block

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
¿ postoperative pain scores.;¿ Postoperative analgesic consumption;¿ Time to feed after tracheal extubation

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactShaimaa Farouk

lecturer of anesthesia and ICU, Faculty of medicine, Tanta University

Shaimaafarouk7777@yahoo.com01270440771

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026