Comparison between Two Different Techniques Of Manufacturing the Surgical Guides On Accuracy Of Implant Placement In Completely Edentulous Patients

Comparison between Two Different Techniques Of Manufacturing the Surgical Guides On Accuracy Of Implant Placement In Completely Edentulous Patients Using CBCT (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201704002210194

Enrollment

Registered

2017-04-15

Start date

2017-05-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Health completely edentulous patients

Interventions

Partially limiting surgical guide manufactured by selective laser sintering technique

Partially limiting surgical guide manufactured by stereolithographic technique

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Completely edentulous patients Patients having enough bone for implant placement with length of at least 10 mm. No apparent bony mal-relation. No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology No uncontrolled systematic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and immunodeficiency.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Drug or alcohol abuse, A health condition precluding surgery, Physical reasons that could affect follow-up, Psychiatric problems, Disorders to the implant area related to a history of radiation therapy to the head and neck, neoplasia, or bone augmentation to the implant site. Smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
linear deviation of implant placement with the two different surgical guides	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactAmal Rekaby

professor

amalrt13@yahoo.com01006072458

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026