Cardiometry versus Transoesophageal Doppler for Peri-operative Haemodynamic Monitoring and Management in Pediatrics Undergoing Kasai operation

Electrical Cardiometry Compared to Transoesophageal Doppler for Peri-operative Haemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Management in Pediatrics Undergoing Kasai Operation

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201703002141319

Enrollment

Registered

2017-03-26

Start date

2015-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paediatrics Extrahepatic biliary atresia, Transoesophageal Doppler, Electrical Cardiometry

Interventions

Transoesophageal Doppler (TED) group

Electrical Cardiometry (EC) group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age: infants below 3 months. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA): grade I / II Surgery: hepatoportoenterostomy (Kasai operation)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Parent refusal. ASA < grade II. Anticoagulant therapy or history of bleeding tendency. Known congenital heart disease with haemodynamic consequences. Preoperative haemodynamic instability or catecholamine infusion. Oesophageal malformation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary goal of this study is to compare the (TED) with (EC) and investigate both relationship with one another and with the traditional central venous pressure (CVP) regarding haemodynamics and fluid management in paediatrics undergoing surgical hepatoportoenterostomy (Kasai operation)	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactRasha Foaad

assistant lecturer of anasthesia and intensive care

rashafoaad@yahoo.com00201092601200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026