Ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling

Impact of Ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling versus laparoscopic ovarian drilling on ovarian reserve and pregnancy rate: a randomized clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201702002035137

Enrollment

240

Registered

2017-02-13

Start date

2017-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy and Childbirth Fertility-female Treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome

Interventions

Transvaginal needle drilling, TND

Laparoscopic ovarian drilling

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of PCOS was based on the revised Rotterdam criteria, CC resistance , A normal semen analysis, normal uterine cavity and bilateral tubal patency .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with FSH >15 mIU/ml, medical disorders as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, contraindications for laparoscopy, endocrine disorders: hyperprolactinemia (prolactin >22 ng/dl), thyroid disorders, cushing¿s syndrome, and acromegaly and patients having organic pelvic disease as well as husband semen abnormalities (severe oligospermia) were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Ovulation rate;Clinical pregnancy rate ;Ovarian reserve measures	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
adverse effects;patient acceptability	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactMohamed Rezk

Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology

m_rezk9207@yahoo.com00201006237186

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026