Patient Satisfaction of orbital prosthesis fabricated by aid of rapid prototyping technology versus conventional technique in orbital defect patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201702001929154

Enrollment

Registered

2016-12-23

Start date

2017-02-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery orbital defect patients due to cancer removal surgery, trauma

Interventions

orbital prothesis made by conventional technique

orbital prosthesis fabricated by aid of rapid prototyping technology

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Orbital resection defects -The bony walls of the orbit should be lined with skin - The patients should be systematically free - The patients should be cooperative and committed to maintain prosthesis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Orbital defects occluded by local or distant tissue flap. - Orbital defects where lids were retained. - Patients with recent surgical intervention in the orbit (within at 6 months). - Patients subjected to radiotherapy. - Patients with serious systemic problems or conditions (including psychiatric disease).

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
patient satisfaction	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Dimensional accuracy of the prothesis	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactSara Eman Saad El-din

Master candidate

Sarah.eman90@gmail.com+20201001689901

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026