High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled study

High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled study.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201609001779105

Enrollment

200

Registered

2016-09-12

Start date

2011-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Paediatrics Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interventions

Conventional ventilation

High frequency oscillation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: If patients had a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) of 200 mm Hg or less and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates were visible on chest radiography without evidence of left atrial hypertension, according to American¿European Consensus Conference Committee (AECC) definition of ARDS.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - pulmonary edema of cardiac origin or due to volume overload - patients with congenital heart disease, - diagnosis of cardiomyopathy or myocarditis, - post cardiac surgery for congenital heart defects.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Oxygenation improvement	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
30 day mortality;PICU length of stay(survivors);Mechanical ventilation days (survivors);Mechanical ventilation free days (survivors)till 30 days;Air leaks occurrence	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactElsayedamr Basma

Patient Information Manager

elsayedamr@yahoo.com00201223106023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026