Skip to content

laparscopic versus open rectal resection

CRT laparscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201602001479105
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-02-19
Start date
2014-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer rectal cancer

Interventions

lap-arscopic rectal resection
open rectal resection for cancer rectum

Sponsors

alexandria main university hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with a solitary adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 15 cm from the anal verge without distant metastases who were candidates for elective surgery were eligible for inclusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cardiovascular or pulmonary instability or failure Severe or unstable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cardiac disease Coagulopathy not correctable preoperatively Extreme obesity Pregnancy Tumor extensively involving contiguous structures Diffuse peritoneal contamination with perforated viscus Acute inflammatory bowel disease (fever, distension, other signs of toxicity) associated with the malignancy Eneroenteric or enterocutaneous fistula Multiple previous abdominal surgeries Obstruction of the intestine with abdominal distension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
postoperative clinical outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
adequacy of surgical margins and number of lymph nodes harvested for colorectal cancer cases.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public Contactisraa aly

Prof

israa.aly@alexmed.edu.eg0021287740750

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026