Skip to content

the impact of continous infusion adjuvants on the quality of recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: dexamedetomidine versus Lidocaine.

the impact of continous infusion adjuvants on the quality of recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: dexameditomidine versus Lidocaine: a double blinded randomized, placebo controlled trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR201411000927335
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-11-04
Start date
2014-12-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

improving anethesia recovery quality

Interventions

dexamidetomedine group

Sponsors

Menofia University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1-ASA 1 and 2 morbidly obese patients with body mass index 40 and above. 2- both male and female patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1- uncontrolled diabetes or uncontrolled hypertension. 2-allergic patients to either dexameditomedine or lidocaine 3-hepatic,renal or respiratory failure 4- smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
quality of recovery by 40 questionaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
morphine consumption

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactHazem Elsersy

Lecturer of Anethesia, Faculty of medicine,Menoufia University

hazelsersy@hotmail.com00201091096655

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026