Conventional versus Computer-assisted techniques for reconstruction of orbitozygomatic fractures

Conventional versus Computer-assisted techniques for reconstruction of orbitozygomatic fractures: A Controlled clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201311000648184

Enrollment

Registered

2013-09-20

Start date

2011-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Musculoskeletal Diseases orbital trauma, zygomatic fractures

Interventions

Computer-Assisted Group

Coventional group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Unilaterally displaced orbitozygomatic complex fractures. Cases indicated for internal orbital reconstruction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients where computed tomographies could not be obtained in DICOM format.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Orbital Volume	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Enophthalmos	—

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactAdel Abou-ElFetouh

Lecturer, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Dept. - Cairo University

a.abouelfetouh@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+20-111-4408950

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026