Three dimensional miniplates versus standard miniplates in fixation of angle mandibular fracture -randomized controlled clinical trial

Three dimensional miniplates versus standard miniplates in fixation of angle mandibular fracture - a randomized controlled clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR201308000492164

Enrollment

Registered

2013-02-01

Start date

2013-01-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases Oral Health Surgery angle mandibular fracture

Interventions

single miniplate by champy techenque

three dimensional miniplate

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1-Randomized or quasi randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trial (CCTs) comparing three dimensional and standard (Champy¿s technique) in fixation of the mandibular angle fracture. 2-Adults dentate patients (>17 years old) with an angle mandibular fracture undergoing open reduction with internal rigid fixation. 3-Any studies comparing the three dimensional miniplate and standard miniplate (Champy technique) in the fixation of angle mandibular fracture .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: All other types of study design, such as case series, case reports, technical reports, animal studies and reviews were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
potoperative complication (infection+malocclusion)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
potoperative bone healing (bone density);hardware failure+mal and un uinon ;trismus;time of operation;potoperative parasthesia	—

Contacts

Public ContactESSAM colleague

lecturer in faculty of dentistry

dressamalmoraissi@gmail.com967777788939

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026